Textile Manufacturing · Consulting

Improving textile production with TPM, SMED, and standard work

A multi-machine improvement program combined TPM, SMED, 5S, maintenance standards, and downtime tracking to address stoppages, changeovers, energy use, and production losses.
USD 18,270.51
reported average monthly fuel saving across 3 machines
221,335 m
reported average monthly production increase across 3 machines
12.27%
reported increase in OEE

01 · Context

The challenge

  • Excessive machine downtime due to lack of Total Productive Maintenance.
  • A large number of style changeovers.
  • Excessive energy consumption associated with poor machine maintenance.
  • Lower hourly production because of machine breakage and slower speeds.
  • No standard operating procedures were in place.
  • No machine-maintenance KPIs were in place.
  • No safety measures were in place.

02 · Delivery

The approach

  1. 01Collected monthly changeover counts.
  2. 02Measured the distance traveled by machine operators.
  3. 03Established a baseline for changeover duration.
  4. 04Trained the team in and implemented Lean Total Productive Maintenance.
  5. 05Applied Lean SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die).
  6. 06Implemented a machine-filter-cleaning SOP.
  7. 07Developed machine-downtime codes and implemented data recording.
  8. 08Identified and eliminated safety issues.
  9. 09Developed and implemented a machine-nozzle-cleaning SOP.
  10. 10Recorded baseline daily average production and fuel consumption.
  11. 11Trained the team in and implemented 5S.

Engagement evidence

Measures and working visuals

Source chart comparing production cost per metre across three stenter machines from January through March.
Reported production cost per metre trend across three machines. Open the image for full size.
Source chart comparing monthly production output across three stenter machines from January through March.
Reported monthly production output across three machines. Open the image for full size.
Source chart comparing monthly fuel cost in Pakistani rupees across three stenter machines from January through March.
Reported monthly fuel cost in PKR across three machines. Open the image for full size.

Source report detail

Project timeline and takeaways

Delivery timeline

  1. 1 weekCollect monthly changeover counts and operator travel-distance dataPhase 1
  2. 1 weekEstablish changeover-duration baseline and train in Lean TPMPhase 2
  3. 1 weekImplement SMED, 5S, and standard operating proceduresPhase 3
  4. 1 weekDevelop downtime codes and implement data recordingPhase 4
  5. 2 monthsImplementation monitoring and post-implementation data collectionPhase 5

Findings and recommendations in the report

  • The report states average monthly fuel savings of USD 18,270.51 across three machines.
  • The report states an average monthly production increase of 221,335 metres across three machines.
  • Machine-filter-cleaning time reportedly improved by 17%.
  • Daily stoppage reportedly decreased by 20% per machine.
  • Overall Equipment Effectiveness reportedly increased by 12.27%.
  • Program-change changeover time reportedly improved by 20%.
  • Shade-matching changeover time reportedly improved by 10%.
  • The report recommends enhanced workforce training and continued improvement in changeover practices.
  • The narrative states safety issues fell from 6 to 0, but its results matrix is inconsistent; no numerical safety reduction is claimed.

Client and employee identities are withheld. Reported figures are retained as source claims; discrepancies are noted rather than silently corrected.

03 · Outcomes

What changed

  • 01The report states average monthly fuel savings of USD 18,270.51 across three machines.
  • 02Average monthly production increased by 221,335 metres across the three machines, according to the report.
  • 03The source records a 12.27% increase in OEE, a 20% reduction in daily stoppage, and a 17% improvement in filter-cleaning time.
  • 04Program-change and shade-matching changeover times were reported to improve by 20% and 10%, respectively.
  • 05The report narrative states that safety issues fell from 6 to 0, but its results matrix is inconsistent on the final count; no numerical safety reduction is claimed here.

Client identity is withheld. Outcomes and measures are presented as documented in the engagement source material.

More case studies

All case studies
Improving textile production with TPM, SMED, and standard work | Case Study | Factual Solutions